Search for: "J. G.1" Results 1 - 20 of 4,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2014, 12:26 pm
One can also surmise that the Plaintiffs - J & J and G & G - may be related as well. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:54 am by Shawn Nevers
Reuben Clark, Jr., who was born on September 1, 1871. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am by Nico Cordes
Article 1, point 1, and Article 2, points 1 and 2, of said decision). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:56 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Matter of J-G-P- does not purport to reassess longstanding BIA and Ninth Circuit precedent concerning simple assault offenses, and because it misapplied that precedent, its conclusion is unreasonable. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In contrast thereto, decision J 4/11 could not apply, as that decision dealt with a case where the application was “deemed to be withdrawn” rather than withdrawn by the appellant.[1] The Board agrees with the appellant that the starting point of the legal analysis should be decision G 1/09. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Matter of J-G-R- (1) Torturous conduct committed by a public official who is “acting in an official capacity,” meaning acting under color of law, is covered by the regulations implementing the Convention Against Torture, but such conduct by an official who is not acting in an official capacity is not covered. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
There is one last point of G 1/07 which I wanted to mention. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a consequence, R 13 EPC 1973 was found to prevent, as lex specialis, the filing of a divisional application if the proceedings for grant concerning the pending earlier application had been stayed (J 20/05 [headnote, 3]; see also G 1/09 [3.2.5], confirming this finding).[4] The principles set out in this jurisprudence are still pertinent under the revised law. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
On July 26 starting at 1 p.m. in the Supreme Court Courtroom, 350 McAllister Street in San Francisco:1-1:30Justice Peter Siggins, as Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three (San Francisco)Commission members: Chief Justice Tani G. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:22 pm by Patent Docs
Andrew Clark and Guy Brain of J A Kemp will review European case law and practice in this area and outline practical steps and measures that can be taken by applicants to help safeguard priority claims in Europe, and look forward to potential developments in the assessment of priority entitlement at the EPO in view of the referrals of the Enlarged Board of Appeal pending as G 1/22 and G 2/22. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Die Beschwerdeführerin bezog sich diesbezüglich insbesondere auf das deutsche Recht und den Grundsatz, dass jede Entscheidung eines hoheitlichen Organs gerichtlich überprüfbar sein müsse.Aus der Entscheidung G 1/97 der Großen Beschwerdekammer ergibt sich, dass sich der Artikel 125 EPÜ "nicht auf das Fehlen von Verfahren, sondern sich nur auf das Fehlen von Vorschriften über das Verfahren bezieht" (G 1/97, Nr. 3 a)… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Die Beschwerdeführerin bezog sich diesbezüglich insbesondere auf das deutsche Recht und den Grundsatz, dass jede Entscheidung eines hoheitlichen Organs gerichtlich überprüfbar sein müsse.Aus der Entscheidung G 1/97 der Großen Beschwerdekammer ergibt sich, dass sich der Artikel 125 EPÜ "nicht auf das Fehlen von Verfahren, sondern sich nur auf das Fehlen von Vorschriften über das Verfahren bezieht" (G 1/97, Nr. 3 a)… [read post]